ShareThis Page

Delmont to decide next month on Speedway's future

| Wednesday, Dec. 4, 2013, 9:01 p.m.

The Delmont Zoning Hearing Board will decide in January if Speedway has any future along Route 66 in the borough.

The board will meet in January to decide whether to grant Marathon Petroleum's request to use a 4.5-acre lot along Route 66, near West Pittsburgh Street, as a gas station. A developer must get permission from the zoning board to use the property for a gas station, borough Solicitor Dan Hewitt said.

Council rejected a controversial plan to build a Speedway gas station and convenience store last month. Officials indicated that the plan did not meet more than 40 requirements outlined in the borough's planning code.

If the zoning board approves the use application, Speedway developers can submit a revised site plan for consideration.

A Marathon spokesman said company officials have agreed to wait until January for the decision. He did not return an email asking if the company would reapply.

Hewitt said the date of the zoning board meeting has not yet been set.

Ohio-based Speedway is in the process of strengthening its presence in the region. It already has a gas station on Route 22 in Monroeville, about a mile from the Murrysville border, and Penn Township officials are considering a plan to build a Speedway near the intersection of Pleasant Valley Road and Route 130.

There also have been proposals to build Speedway stations in Unity Township and New Stanton in recent months.

Daveen Rae Kurutz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8627.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.