Borland chosen as Franklin Regional board president
In front, from left, are Franklin Regional school board members Roberta Cook, Jane Tower, Susan Ilgenfritz and George Harding. In back are Superintendent Jamie Piraino, board members Herb Yingling, Jeremy Samek, Gregg Neavin, Larry Borland and Dennis Pavlik and Magisterial Judge Charles Conway — who swore in Ilgenfritz, Harding, Samek and Neavin.
Photo by Photo Daveen Rae Kurutz Murrysville Star
For the first time since 2005, the Franklin Regional School Board has a new leader.
The board Monday elected Larry Borland as its new president and appointed former president Herb Yingling as vice president.
“I was surprised with this decision,” said Borland, who took office two years ago. “I hope to count on Herb as a mentor on things.”
Borland and Yingling were the only nominees for their positions and were appointed by a unanimous vote. Both were nominated by board member Jane Tower.
Tower said there have been substantial changes in the school board in recent months. Four political newcomers — George Harding, Susan Ilgenfritz, Gregg Neavin and Jeremy Samek — defeated three incumbents and another candidate in last month's election. Yingling and board member Roberta Cook are the only remaining board members who served prior to 2011.
Yingling had served as board president since 2005. Tower said it was time for a change.
“We had been moving towards this for a while; other board members had been nominated for president in the past,” Tower said.
Borland, 68, is a pediatric anesthesiologist at Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC. Though he has a busy work schedule, he said, he will have time for his responsibilities as board president.
“The question came, what about the time commitment?” Borland said. “I'm prepared to do the time commitment and make adjustments to my career.”
Cook was re-elected as treasurer by a 7-2 vote. Neavin received the other two votes.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.