Delmont gas station plan still on hold
Plans to bring a Speedway gas station to Delmont are on hold after Marathon officials postponed a zoning hearing board request, borough officials said.
Solicitor Dan Hewitt said last week that Speedway officials asked to not meet in January regarding a request to allow the company to use a commercial property along Route 66 near West Pittsburgh Street as a gas station.
“We don't know what's going to happen,” Council President Jim Bortz said. “All we know is it's on hold. We haven't heard from Speedway or Marathon.”
Council in November rejected the site plan for a 4.5-acre gas station and a request for an extension on the plans at the recommendation of the borough planning commission. However, the zoning hearing board request — which was submitted in mid-October — still is outstanding.
The Speedway plans met with consternation from local residents, who said they didn't want a “truck stop” near a residential neighborhood. Borough officials likened the plans to ones for a Sheetz or GetGo.
Hewitt said the company hasn't withdrawn the zoning request and have not resubmitted plans.
Daveen Rae Kurutz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8627, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.