Franklin Regional might add student reps to school board
Franklin Regional might add some seats to its school board table.
Superintendent Jamie Piraino has suggested adding student representatives to the school board. Students would give reports each month but would not have a vote in district business.
“From a personal standpoint, it's a management thing from our end,” Piraino said. “From a student perspective, I'd give up those management things to give the students that experience.”
Piraino said he thinks adding a student representative program would offer students the ability to become comfortable presenting in front of groups and decipher the difference between student issues and gossip or complaining.
Board member Roberta Cook said she has some reservations about the idea.
“I don't want to see it become a student gripe forum,” Cook said. “They need to understand that this is a forum to discuss certain things, not student opinions on certain things.”
Both Penn-Trafford and Norwin have student liaisons who present a report each month at voting board meetings. Piraino said the practice also was in place at his former district, Greater Latrobe.
Board members George Harding and Jeremy Samek said they support the idea. Samek suggested inviting class presidents from the high school to participate.
Piraino said he plans to “lay the groundwork” with students to make sure they understand what the position entails.
Piraino said he envisions the program beginning as early as fall.
Daveen Rae Kurutz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8627.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.