No contamination reported after small spill at Beaver Run Reservoir
An engine oil spill at a Marcellus shale well pad at Beaver Run Reservoir in Washington Township caused a small fire Saturday, state Department of Environmental Protection officials said Wednesday.
The spill did not cause soil or water contamination at the reservoir, which serves 150,000 residents of Westmoreland County, including those in Murrysville, Export and Delmont, said John Poister, DEP spokesman.
An unknown amount of engine oil was spilled onto a holding tank at the Mamont South 1A pad, he said. A pump engine on site failed, causing the spill. The spill caused a fire, which damaged the metal cover put on top of the secondary holding tank.
CNX Gas, a division of Consol Energy, has been conducting Marcellus shale drilling at the reservoir since 2010.
“No environmental impacts occurred and mitigation was successfully completed during each of these events. Consol Energy was not issued violations for any of the incidents in question,” Consol spokeswoman Kate O'Donovan said in an email Thursday.
Poister said there is no visible damage to the holding tank, but state officials will return to the site for further inspection.
This is at least the fifth incident requiring DEP attention since June at Consol's drilling operation at the reservoir in Bell and Washington townships.
In June, CNX Gas was cited after a fracking fluid spill. Another spill occurred in November, records show. In February, two barrels of oil-based mud were discharged on the site.
The Municipal Authority of Westmoreland County could not be reached for comment.
Daveen Rae Kurutz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8627, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.