ShareThis Page

Franklin Regional school board agrees to use eSchool Plus

| Wednesday, March 19, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

Franklin Regional is taking another nod from Greater Latrobe School District — but this time, it's for its student-information system.

The school board on Monday agreed to swap student-information systems and begin using eSchool Plus. District officials visited Greater Latrobe last month to check out the system.

“I'm thinking everyone is going to be very happy,” said Superintendent Jamie Piraino, who worked on the system during his time at Greater Latrobe. “Every system has its glitches, but everyone is going to see significant improvements.”

At the start of the school year, officials decided to abandon SchoolMax Enterprise software — which still is in use — after several major problems arose. Officials from Harris School Solutions said the program was not suitable for a district as small as Franklin Regional.

Scheduling has been particularly problematic in the current program. Assistant Superintendent Mary Catherine Reljac said there are multiple scenarios for fall scheduling, which might be done manually to avoid using the current program.

Piraino called the new program a “more robust” application.

The district will pay about $227,000 during the next three school years for the program, which includes a gradebook, a parent portal, lesson-planning software and data-analysis programs.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.