Permit application filed, Murrysville sewer repair could take up to a year
It likely will be several months before the faulty main sewer line in Murrysville will be fully fixed.
Officials with the Franklin Township Municipal Sanitary Authority filed a state permit application to replace its force main line — a sewer line that carries most of the sewage from Murrysville, Export and Delmont to a treatment plant — last week. But municipal officials say the permit application could take up to a year.
“It's a six- to 12-month timeline,” said Councilman Jeff Kepler, municipal liaison to the authority. “They've put in a request to speed it up a bit.”
Authority manager Jim Brucker was unavailable for comment. Assistant manager Kevin Kaplan said authority officials hope the process will move along quickly.
John Poister, a spokesman for the state Department of Environmental Protection, said the department will review the application for completeness this week.
Poister said authority officials are trying to obtain a right of way for the ideal path for the new line. Currently, the force main crosses over Turtle Creek several times. That's not ideal under state regulations.
Brucker had proposed running the line along the Turtle Creek Railroad, which is slated to become part of a county rails-to-trails program. The authority is negotiating for the right of way for the property, Poister said.
Poister said authority officials hoped to have an agreement reached this week.
“They're very, very close but (have) not yet completed all rights of way, I'm told,” he said.
Daveen Rae Kurutz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8627, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.