ShareThis Page

Residents speak out against plans to sell borough building

| Wednesday, July 16, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

Despite assurances that plans to possibly sell the Delmont borough building are in their infancy, several borough residents want council to reconsider the idea.

More than a dozen residents attended the July 8 council meeting to speak out against the idea of selling the borough building, which also houses the borough library, a day care and several businesses. Officials last month announced that they were exploring the options of selling the building and expanding the borough garage to house borough offices and the police department.

“Isn't this place good enough for you people?” resident Julie Walczer asked council. “Do you need to be like Murrysville with their wooden desks? This is a bad idea.”

Council President Jim Bortz said several proposals will be unveiled at a public meeting later this summer or this fall.

“The last time somebody suggested the borough building was going to be sold, it caused a major uprising from the people who rent from us,” Bortz said. “This is an information-gathering. Is it feasible, do we want to do it, or does it make sense? There has been no point in getting everyone involved until now.”

Any move is at minimum a year away, Bortz said.

Heather Evakovich operates the Salem Crossing Day Care out of the building and said she wants an extended lease to assure her clients that the business will be there for the foreseeable future.

“Salem Crossroads Day care has called Delmont home for the better part of three decades,” Evankovich said. “We want to create stability for the day care and to make sure that it stays in Delmont.”

Borough engineer Gary Baird said his firm is developing scenarios that would allow the borough to relocate its offices. Baird said it is part of a series of studies the firm has done during the past eight to 10 years.

“We started reviewing the borough's facilities, sewers, roads, everything,” Baird said. “Our improvements don't happen overnight. For the last 12-15 months, we've taken a look at what are the costs at the different facilities.”

Officials said the borough doesn't make money from renting the building. Instead, its leases help the borough break-even on building expenses, such as utilities.

The Delmont Library Board has worries about what options are being reviewed, said president Dave Weber.

“You seem predisposed that you need a new building,” Weber said. “It doesn't make any sense to me to move from a break-even position to a cost. The only way you get that money is back is from the taxpayers.”

Daveen Rae Kurutz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-871-2365, or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.