Share This Page

Murrysville sanitary authority uses GPS technology to monitor fleet

| Wednesday, July 16, 2014, 9:00 p.m.
Lillian DeDomenic | For The Murrysville Star
The GPS tracking system used by the FTMSA has shown a substantial cost savings since initiated by the Authority. The system is currently used on six of the Authority's truck. Kevin Kaplan, assistant manager, stands near two of the vehicles.
Lillian DeDomenic | For The Murrysville Star
The GPS tracking system used by the FTMSA has shown a substantial cost savings since initiated by the Authority. The system is currently used on six of the Authority's truck. Kevin Kaplan, assistant manager, demonstrates the new system.

A new GPS tracking program is saving the Franklin Township Municipal Sanitary Authority more than 100 gallons of gas each month.

Officials in September installed GPS units in the dashboard of six of the authorities 10 trucks. The units give assistant manager Kevin Kaplan the ability to track where trucks are and whether the vehicles are idling.

“It does improve efficiency, and we know where the guys are at and how long they're there,” Kaplan said. “It's paying for itself.”

The authority equipped six trucks with the tracking equipment — a field inspector's vehicle, a truck used for pump-station visits and repairs, a truck used for lateral inspections, a crane truck, a dump truck and a pickup truck used daily.

The project cost about $1,550 for equipment and $180 per month for the service. During the fall months, Kaplan found that the authority saved about $310 per month in gas costs.

By tracking the vehicles, Kaplan can dispatch a truck geographically closer to a line break or inspection rather than calling an inspector who might be 20 miles away.

Authority officials began instructing workers to turn off their trucks if they would be parked for more than five minutes.

“During the winter or summer, guys would get out for an inspection that would take 20 minutes,” Kaplan said. “They'd leave the heat or the air running. That isn't happening now.”

The authority has a gas pump on site to refuel authority vehicles, which makes it easy to track fuel usage, Kaplan said. In fall 2012, the authority used an average of 494.75 gallons of gas each month. After installing GPS units, that amount decreased to an average of 375 gallons each month. During a four-month time period, that equated to nearly $1,500 in savings, Kaplan said.

In 2012, the authority spent $20,100 on fuel, Kaplan said. A reduction of 4 miles per day on each vehicle would net the authority a 10 percent cost savings, he said.

Manager Jim Brucker — whose authority-issued vehicle is not one of the six equipped with a tracking device — lauded the decision.

“I was skeptical about it when (Kaplan) first came to me,” Brucker said. “We've always complained about idling. Now, all of the employees know that they're being watched, and it's saving money.”

Kaplan said he would like to have the equipment on all 10 vehicles, but it's not cost-effective, especially because three of the four that do not have tracking equipment installed are specialty vehicles that aren't frequently used.

“I would like to do all of the trucks, but that would reduce our cost savings,” Kaplan said. “But the more I use this, the more I love it.”

Daveen Rae Kurutz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-871-2365.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.