ShareThis Page

Lantern tours light up Hampton Museum

| Wednesday, Oct. 10, 2012, 9:03 p.m.
Pine Creek Journal
Lantern Tours guide Karen Parsons of Richland stands by window of the 175-year-old church at Depreciation Lands Museum with a life-size cutout of “The Deacon,” a shadowy figure reportedly glimpsed in the church. Deborah Deasy | Pine Creek Journal
Pine Creek Journal
'The Deacon' has been seen by many witnesses, including a cleaning woman at the church who fell off a ladder and reports that he cushioned her fall. Deborah Deasy | Pine Creek Journal
Pine Creek Journal
Tthe Depreciation Lands Museum tour in Hampton will include a relocated log house that was originally built in 1803. Deborah Deasy | Pine Creek Journal

Tales of “The Deacon,” a shadowy figure, annually unfold during the Halloween-season strolls slated to wind through the Depreciation Lands Museum in Hampton.

No one knows if the ghostly man — sighted in 19th century-style clothes — once led worshippers inside the museum's oldest structure, the former Pine Creek Covenanter Church.

It's a red-brick structure, built in 1837, with soaring windows and creaky floors.

Mystery lovers and ghost hunters can visit the 175-year-old landmark during the Lantern Tours set for Oct. 20 and Oct. 27 at the museum.

Participants also will explore the museum's historic cemetery, one-room schoolhouse, centuries-old log cabin and working blacksmith's shop — all by candlelight.

Along the way, costumed guides will demonstrate Colonial customs and share stories of early American superstitions and funeral rites.

“You had to sit with the deceased, and people took shifts ... One of reasons was to make sure they were really dead,” said Karen Parsons, volunteer coordinator for the Depreciation Lands Museum. “One of people's great fears in the 19th century was being buried alive.”

Parsons will be among volunteers leading the Lantern Tours. Servings of cookies and cider will close the outings.

Each year, Parsons' husband, Kevin, lurks the museum grounds, dressed as “The Deacon,” during the Lantern Tours.

“Most people don't notice,” he said. “Some people get freaked out.”

Museum volunteers first reported seeing “The Deacon” in 1973, after Hampton Township purchased the museum grounds and renovations began in the former Pine Creek Covenanter Church.

“There were people who thought they caught a glimpse of an old man wearing a long black coat and old-fashioned boots, and that he helped them with the renovations in various ways,” Parsons said. “He has always been credited with being benevolent.”

“The Deacon” reportedly rescued one boy as he was painting a door frame next to a stairwell.

“His ladder tipped, and everyone was sure that he was going to fall into the stairwell, but somehow, the ladder was pushed upright again,” Parsons said.

Another tale recalls a woman working alone repairing one of the church's window frames.

“She thought she caught a glimpse of a tall man wearing old-fashioned boots and trousers,” Parsons said.

“She claimed she said, ‘Well, don't just stand there. You could at least help me.' All of the sudden, the window went into place.”

No one knows the glimpsed figure's name, according to Parsons.

“A couple years ago, I had a visitor come to me on a Sunday afternoon,” Parsons said. “He said, ‘I was a member of this church ... Do you know about the deacon?'

“He said, 'My mother was cleaning in this church. She was up on a ladder,'” Parsons said.

“He pointed to one corner of the room and said, ‘She fell, and somehow, she was gently lowered to the ground. She did not get hurt.'”

More recently, a spooked electrician reportedly fled the structure — while performing repairs — when he repeatedly found a light switch turned off, after he repeatedly turned on the switch.

Deborah Deasy is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-772-6369 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.