Former Little Brown Jug restaurant demolished; goal is to make Shaler site safe
After almost four years of sitting vacant, the building formerly The Little Brown Jug restaurant in Shaler Township came down last week.
Crews from Pampena Landscape and Construction of Plum were on site to tear down the structure that had been vacant and falling into disrepair since March 17, 2009 when a fire destroyed the property.
“It was a hazard and an eye sore,” said Lori Voegtly Mizgorski, township commissioner for Ward 2, who has fond memories of the small Bauerstown neighborhood restaurant.
“We had hoped for a very long time it could be remodeled and made into something new that would be a viable part of the community, but that wasn't going to happen, so we were left with no other choice.”
The Shaler Township Board of Commissioners condemned the structure in October and in December approved Pampena Landscape and Construction for the demolition project for $6,850.
Pampena crews planned to complete demolition earlier this week. Demolition was slowed because crews were trying to recycle as many materials and metal from the site as possible.
The property owners, David Candle and La Buena Comida LLC, had requested the demolition be delayed because they had a potential buyer and if the building was demolished the sale would not go through.
But township officials said they could not wait.
“We'll make the site safe,” said Tim Rogers, township manager. “Then site will be clean and should be available for sale.”
Rogers said a sale is pending and might close next month.
“Hopefully it will be a fresh new start (for the site) and something that would contribute to the Bauerstown community,” Mizgorski said.
Bethany Hofstetter is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-772-6364 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.