Hampton teachers have new contract
Hampton Township School District teachers have a new contract after unanimous approval by the school board last week.
The board approved the contract at its voting meeting on Jan. 14, to start retroactively from July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2016.
“A big thank you to the Hampton negotiation team,” said school board President David Gurwin. “I really believe the entire process was handled in a very professional manner.
“We knew we had a partner on the other side of the table in people who truly care about the education of our students.”
The contract includes a wage freeze of the salary schedule during the 2013-2014 school year to maintain the current year's schedule.
District officials project teachers' salaries to increase, on average, about 3 percent; however, teachers at the top of the salary scale will experience an average increases of less than 1 percent.
The district also will see a reduction in projected future healthcare costs due to an increase in premium contributions, as well as other adjustments to the healthcare program.
The new contract also contains a one-time, early-retirement incentive, which will reduce the overall effect on payroll.
The teachers' contract expired at the end of last school year, in June 2012, and the Hampton Township Education Association bargaining team and district representatives met about once per month to negotiate with a state-appointed mediator present.
The negotiations committees reached a tentative deal on Dec. 19, and the union membership approved the agreement on Jan. 10.
Representatives from the district and Hampton Township Education Association signed the collective-bargaining agreement last week after all final revisions were complete.
Bethany Hofstetter is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-772-6364 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.