Scheduling make-up day on MLK Day unintentional at Pine-Richland
Pine-Richland School District had classes on Monday, Martin Luther King Day, a move the district said was unintentional.
Pine-Richland, like Shaler Area School District, held classes to make up for classes cancelled Oct. 30 in the wake of Superstorm Sandy.
“Originally, school was not in session,” said Rachel Hathhorn, spokeswoman for Pine-Richland.
“The district scheduled Jan. 21, 2013 as the first emergency make-up day a year ago. The district typically uses the first emergency day to make up any cancelled days. Scheduling a make-up day on Jan. 21, 2013 was unintentional.”
Pine-Richland parent Marsha Wade is upset about the district's decision to schedule classes on Monday, a federal holiday.
“We did not send our children to school, but instead engaged in Martin Luther King activities and watched the presidential inauguration, a privilege that should have been afforded to every family in the district,” Wade wrote in a Jan. 21 email to the school board.
Hathhorn said that students participated in special classes and lessons to “mark the significance of Martin Luther King Day.”
“The district understands the importance of recognizing Martin Luther King Day and is taking great care in its future planning,” Hathhorn said.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.