School officials at Hampton earmark cash for projects
Hampton Township School District administrators are vying to continue facility improvements by putting money aside for the 2013-14 school year.
Last week, Hampton's school board approved the transfer of $700,000 from the general fund to the capital project fund to cover the cost of a list of improvements at all but one of the district's buildings.
“Right now, this is our meager, if you will, capital improvement fund,” said Jeff Kline, director of administrative services.
The list includes evaluating swimming pool piping at the high school, which Mary Alice Hennessey, school board member and facilities chairwoman, said is original to the school. If needed, the improvement plan includes $20,000 to restore or repair the piping.
At the middle school, the administration plans to improve the band room, install storage cabinets for all instruments and install stairs at the stage to the mezzanine area.
Two of the most expensive items involve paving projects at Wyland and Central elementary schools.
The parking lots and roadways on the grounds of the two schools were last paved in the early to mid-1990s, and the district has had to postpone the projects recently because of a lack of funds. The two projects come with a combined price tag estimated at more than $500,000.
In addition to those improvements, proposed capital improvements also include providing power to the baseball scoreboard, installing athletic-field signs, and leveling and seeding the multipurpose field in front of the high school parking lot.
Larry Vasko, school board member and finance chairperson, said the capital-improvement list might change, depending on need and the final cost.
Bethany Hofstetter is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-772-6364 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.