Plans discussed for uses of former Pittsburgh Cut Flower Co. site in Richland
People crowded Northern Tier Regional Library this month to suggest future uses for the 180-acre, former Richland home of Pittsburgh Cut Flower Co.
Some suggested hiking, fishing, canoeing and disc golfing.
Others recommended the property be used for weddings, community gardens, guided horseback rides and a farmer's market.
“We want to see young people involved in community service projects,” said Cynthia Navadeh of Franklin Park.
Others proposed a café, restrooms and a museum.
People sat at round tables and wrote down their suggestions on maps of the property as landscape architect Sara Moore of Moore Design Associates circulated through the crowd.
“We're going to take all this input, put it in a pot, stir it up and come back,” Roy Kraynyk, director of land protection for the Allegheny Land Trust, told everyone who attended the Feb. 9 brainstorming session.
About 170 people, including former Pittsburgh Cut Flower Co. employees, showed up to share their ideas.
“I started working there for 75 cents an hour. When I left 10 years later, I got $1.10,” said Patty Tutak of West Deer. “We didn't make much money, but we had a lot of fun.”
The “visioning exercise” followed a Feb. 9 illustrated talk about the history of Pittsburgh Cut Flower Co by Brian Newhouse, who now lives in the former homestead of the company's founder, the late Fred Burki.
Allegheny Land Trust plans to buy the flower firm's former property for $1.4 million from its current owners — Legacy Landings LLC — and permanently protect the land for recreation and limited economic development.
So far, the trust has received $1,064,500 in grants and donations for the purchase, according to Kraynyk. The gifts include a $509,500 grant from the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources.
Farmer Charles Robertson of West Deer urged the land trust to exercise caution in mapping the property's reincarnation, and implementing too many suggestions for future uses of the 180 acres.
“Find out what's there — above the ground, and under the ground,” Robertson said. “If all these ideas come to fruition, you're going to ruin the place.”
Kraynyk assured Robertson that won't happen and described the brainstorming session as “part of a site re-assessment.”
“We're a land conservation organization,” Kraynyk said. “We don't want to put a wall around it,” Kraynyk said about the 180-acre property. “We want to tread on it lightly.”
Deborah Deasy is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-772-6369 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.