Hampton teens finish projects; earn Boy Scouts highest honor
Dale Miller, left, and Kevin Rodack, of Boy Scout Troop 17, earned Eagle Scout, the highest rank in Boy Scouting.
Photo by Pine Creek Journal
Two Hampton High School students and Boy Scouts with Troop 17 earned Eagle Scout rank, the highest honor in Boy Scouting.
To earn the honor, seniors Dale Miller and Kevin Rodack, both of Hampton, each were required to earn at least 21 Merit Badges, including 12 Eagle-Scout required badges; show leadership to other Scouts; demonstrate living the Scout Law; obtain at least five letters of recommendation; and complete a community service project before their 18th birthday.
Miller, now 18, organized a project to build a path through the woods at WildBird Recovery, a wild bird rehabilitation center in Valencia, so visitors can see the birds in their natural habitat.
He organized a team of volunteers to clear the path and create a sign, which he had laser-engraved at the Hampton Middle School, for the path.
Rodack, 17, updated the landscaping at St. Andrew the Apostle Byzantine Catholic Church in Gibsonia, and coordinated the building of two large picnic tables for parish socials.
He organized a group of volunteers to weed the existing gardens, remove the old edging, install new edging with a more stable profile, add more landscape gravel and replace some shrubs. The 10-foot picnic tables were cut, stained and assembled by volunteers.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.