McCandless resident honored for volunteer work
She didn't get up right away, even as her children urged her to stand.
“I was so surprised I just sat there,” said Teresa Amelio of McCandless, the newest Pittsburgh Volunteer Citizen of the Year.
Her designation was announced at a gala dinner at the Sen. John Heinz History Center in Pittsburgh on March 30. Amelio previously had been one of five finalists selected from 51 nominees in the second annual competition, sponsored by Trib Total Media and Direct Energy.
Amelio, 74, was recognized for donating family property that now is the Rosalinda Sauro Sirianni Garden in Bellevue, a garden that North Hills Community Outreach, or NHCO, uses to grow produce for its food-pantry clients.
“Given Teresa's initial land donation and the ultimate sustainability of her gift, the proverb ‘Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish, and you feed him for a lifetime' certainly rang true,” said Todd Sandford, Direct Energy's vice president, small business.
Because of her laudable work, Amelio earned $5,000 for NHCO and $1,000 for herself. She immediately shared her portion with the four finalists.
“I'm glad Teresa's contribution has been recognized,” said Fay Morgan, NHCO executive director.
The $5,000 grant will be put toward garden operations this growing season.
There were many to thank, Amelio said, such as the sponsors of the event; Morgan, who nominated her; the other finalists, who had given so much to the community; and her mother, Rosalinda Sauro Sirianni, her inspiration.
“I was on such a high at the gala,” she said. “It was a surreal experience for me.”
Dona S. Dreeland is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-772-6353 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.