Recreation ideas wanted for former Pittsburgh Cut Flowers
Allegheny Land Trust is seeking ideas for ways to use the 180-acre former Pittsburgh Cut Flower Co. property in Richland.
A brainstorming session to gather suggestions is set for 2 p.m. Saturday, April 20, at the Northern Tier Regional Library.
Landscape architect Sara Moore, Chatham University graduate student James Snow and representatives of Allegheny Land Trust will gather input and present sketches of potential opportunities at the site.
Allegheny Land Trust plans to buy the property for $1.4 million from its current owners — Legacy Landings LLC — and permanently protect the land for recreation and limited economic development.
So far, the trust has received more than $1 million in grants and donations for the purchase, according to Roy Kraynyk, director of land protection for the trust.
The gifts include a $509,500 grant from the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources.
A $14,250 grant from the Garden Club of Allegheny County is among the latest donations. The garden group wants the trust to use the gift for developing a master plan for the former Pittsburgh Cut Flower Co. property.
The trust plans to use the money to maximize public input on how the land should be used for public recreation.
In February, about 170 people attended an inaugural brainstorming session at the Northern Tier library. Some suggested hiking, fishing, canoeing and disc golfing. Others recommended the property for weddings, community gardens, guided horseback rides and a farmer's market. Others proposed a café, restrooms and a museum.
Northern Tier Regional Library is at 4015 Dickey Road, Richland. For information on the April 20 meeting, call Allegheny Land Trust at 412-741-2750.
Deborah Deasy is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-772-6369 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.