Shaler officials to lower property taxes
Shaler Township Board of Commissioners approved lowering the property tax rate for 2013 to prevent a windfall from the countywide property reassessment.
Shaler officials “reset” the millage to 2.49, down from 3.05 mills, to meet state requirements that municipalities not receive more than 5 percent above the previous year's property-tax revenue.
“The township has been working for months trying to refine the numbers from Allegheny County,” township manager Tim Rogers said. “There are still a significant number of appeals out there.”
The 2.49 tax rate gives the township a 4-percent increase in revenue; however, with the number of appeals still pending, Rogers said, he thinks the township will maintain a steady revenue stream.
“Ultimately, we think we'll be very close to break-even,” Rogers said, “possibly come out below break even.”
There are 12,800 residential properties in Shaler Township according to Judy Kording, the township finance officer. The adjusted tax rate of 2.49 mills is equal to $249 on a home assessed at $100,000 or $498 on a home assessed at $200,000.
Shaler Township officials traditionally set the millage in December; however the board didn't vote on the tax rate until May 14 in order to base the rate on the most refined reassessment number from the county.
“We think this is a fair number,” Rogers said.
Bethany Hofstetter is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-772-6364 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.