Share This Page

Photo Gallery: North Hills School District's "Arts Alive"

| Sunday, May 26, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Randy Jarosz | For the McKnight Journal
Zoey Allen, 7 (left); mom Tiffany Allen; and Gabriel Allen, 4, all of Ross Township, react to student-made puppets during the North Hills School District's 'Arts Alive' event Friday, May 3, 2013, at North Hills Senior High School in Ross.
Randy Jarosz | For the McKnight Journal
Brendan Evans, 9, of Ross Township takes a sip of a steamer from a student-made clay mug during the North Hills School District's 'Arts Alive' event Friday, May 3, 2013, at North Hills Senior High School in Ross.
Randy Jarosz | For the McKnight Journal
Caleb Delph, 6, (left) and Sophia Hilden, 5, both of Ross Township, scrutinize student-made clay bowls during the North Hills School District's 'Arts Alive' event Friday, May 3, 2013, at North Hills Senior High School in Ross.
Randy Jarosz | For the McKnight Journal
Grant Norberg, 8, of Ross Township (center) looks at some pieces of art with his grandparents Tom Hindman (left) and Marianne Hindman, both of West Mifflin, during the North Hills School District's 'Arts Alive' event Friday, May 3, 2013, at North Hills Senior High School in Ross.
Randy Jarosz | For the McKnight Journal
Dan Derby of Ross Township, a 2007 graduate of North Hills Senior High School, judges senior Dan Connoly's concept Lamborghini during the North Hills School District's 'Arts Alive' event Friday, May 3, 2013, at North Hills Senior High School in Ross.

The North Hills School District had its annual “Arts Alive” event May 3 at North Hills Senior High School in Ross Township.

Those who attended had a chance to see artwork by kindergartners through 12th-graders, performances and other examples of things the district's students have been working on this school year.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.