Reading gives Shaler Area students change of pace
Shaler Area Elementary School students in the fourth through sixth grade celebrated the end of the “Blazing a Titan Trail: A Reading Adventure,” a reading incentive program, with a slight detour from the usual day of special activities.
Last week, close to 1,000 students who read 25 books or more over the course of the school year spent the day participating in a variety of activity stations on campus grounds, as opposed to Millvale Riverfront Park, which was unavailable this year because of an Alcosan construction project on the Three Rivers Heritage Trail.
Students learned to cast fishing lines from state Fish & Boat Commission representatives, had the opportunity to soak teachers in a dunk tank, completed activities with the Carnegie Science Center staff and played on inflatables.
The school also substituted a walk around the neighborhoods near the school for the usual walk along the river on the Three Rivers Heritage Trail.
“I think it's become part of our culture,” Judy Deer, a fifth-grade teacher, said of the “Titan Trail” initiative and celebration day. “We value reading … and they get excited about it.”
Student across the grade levels also were recognized for reading 1 million words or more over the course of the year. This year, 136 students reached the milestone.
“They seem to want to increase their goal each year,” said Suzanne Flynn, school librarian. “It's amazing to see kids wanting to walk around with books. This is a school that reads.”
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.