Pine-Richland graduate wins national architecture contest
Tyler Mikita, 18, of Richland wonders whether to become an engineer or an architect.
He has almost $20,000 in scholarships to study engineering at the University of Akron in Ohio, but he recently won a national contest for budding architects.
“I'm questioning my decision to study engineering,” Mikita said after placing first — and winning $1,500 — in the 2012-13 CAD Design/Drafting Competition sponsored by the National Association of Women in Construction.
“I've always loved architecture. I loved Legos,” said Mikita, a recent graduate of Pine-Richland High School, and the son of Ray and Sandy Mikita.
To win the national design contest, Mikita spent about eight months, often working in the wee hours, to design a prescribed, single-story residence for a family with three children, named the Smiths.
“When everybody thought I was sleeping, I was working on this,” said Mikita, a self-described night owl.
The competition required all participants to incorporate a separate entrance and storage area for a Mrs. Smith's home-based business, plus display cases for Mr. Smith's collection of model tractors.
“What you do, starting off, is you kind of hand draw it, to get ideas. For me, at least, that's the hardest part,” Mikita said.
“Probably a third of the project was me just trying to come up with the original floor plan,” he said. “Because you come up with something, and then you don't like it, and you change it again, and then finally you get something you do like, and you start drawing it on the computer, but then you realize you don't like it, so you go back to hand drawing it, and you finally get something that works.”
Mikita submitted about a dozen 24-inch-by-36-inch blueprints to satisfy contest requirements.
His house plans won local and regional competitions before advancing to the national level.
“This is a big deal ... It's a lot of work,” architect Suzan Lami of Edgewood and Lami Grubb Architects said about Mikita's accomplishment.
“Students all over the country compete against each other and are given the same design problem.”
Lami administers the local CAD Design/Drafting Competition annually sponsored by Pittsburgh Chapter 161 of the National Association of Women in Construction.
“This is the first time we've ever had a first-, second- or third-place winner,” Lami said.
The National Association of Women in Construction annually sponsors the contest to recognize high school students “for creative design, successful problem solving and craftsmanship in preparing architectural drawings,” according to the association's online site.
“Entries are evaluated for detail, accuracy and originality of work.”
Members of the design department at Becker College, Worcester, Mass., judged finalists' entries in this year's competition, according to Sue-Ellen Stoddard, a trustee of the National Association of Women in Construction Education Foundation and CEO of Robmar Design Associates, Hopkinton, Mass.
“We had 658 students participate throughout the United States,” Stoddard said. “We had some amazing entries this year.”
Mikita used Autodesk AutoCAD Architecture software to draw up his house plans and complete his contest entry.
“I can't really draw at all,” said Mikita, who also got help with this contest entry from teacher Jeff Maple of the technology-education department at Pine-Richland High School.
“He skipped lunch and came down to my room every day to work on it,” Maple said. “He worked at home as well.”
Mikita “definitely has a full grip on the idea of architecture and what it's all about ... He fits the engineering mold, too. He pays attention to detail,” Maple said about Mikita. “Either field that he gets into, he's going to be fine.”
Deborah Deasy is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-772-6369 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.