Some suburbanites battling for right to raise chickens on their properties
By Bobby Cherry
Published: Wednesday, July 10, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Jon Barker wants to raise chickens in his backyard, but zoning regulations in his community leave the Baldwin Borough resident without a chicken coop of his own.
He's among a number of suburban Pittsburgh residents looking to ditch store-bought eggs for backyard chickens.
Their efforts, in some cases, are forcing municipal leaders to reconsider ordinances for farm fowl in residential neighborhoods — in many areas where farms once ruled the roost.
“It's about having local, fresh eggs,” said Barker, 31, who, along with his partner Amber Aughenbaugh have petitioned Baldwin Borough to consider adopting an ordinance similar to one in Pittsburgh allowing residents to keep chickens in their backyards.
“We don't want to eat the chickens,” Barker said. “We don't consider them pets, but also don't consider them livestock.”
Because Baldwin Borough does not regulate property owners keeping chickens, Barker said he won't consider a coop until the municipality's ordinances change.
“We thought it best to do it officially instead of skirting around the law,” he said.
In Hampton, resident Max Rosarius awaits a ruling in Allegheny Common Pleas Court on an appeal he filed in September against the township zoning hearing board denying the homeowner's request to keep chickens on his 14 acres.
Rosarius said he thinks communities are “deliberately trying to zone farms out of business because they want to have (the land) for development.”
Last year, Hampton officials cited Rosarius for violating the municipality's zoning ordinance after one of his goats escaped. He also was cited for noisy fowl following residents' complaints.
Rosarius takes care of about 50 roosters and hens, and four goats where local zoning rules prohibit farm animals.
He contends the state's Right-To-Farm Act allows residents with at least 10 acres of land to have a farm, and said his property would qualify.
“It should not be an issue anywhere,” Rosarius said. “My God, this is still America.”
Hampton solicitor Vincent Tucceri directed questions to zoning board solicitor James Mall, who could not be reached for comment.
Robert Lauer has three chickens in his Murrysville backyard.
“You don't even know we have them,” Lauer said, adding that the chicken coop only was discovered by a code enforcement officer after the municipality received a complaint about his fire pit.
“Technically, you're not supposed to have them, which is ridiculous since dogs are way more of a nuisance than the chickens,” said Lauer, who has two dogs. “They'll run the whole yard and bark at everybody. They're probably 20 times more of a nuisance than the chickens are.”
In Murrysville, residents must have at least 10 acres of land to keep chickens, Chief Administrator James Morrison said.
Planning commission members there recently considered changing the law, but leaders opted not to move forward with legislation, Morrison said.
It isn't the first time the issue has come up. Morrison said about every five years, Murrysville leaders consider altering the law.
Lauer said he doesn't agree with the municipality considering chickens as livestock.
“Really, they're poultry,” he said. “Livestock is horses and cows and pigs. I can understand needing 10 acres for those types of animals, but not for chickens. It's ridiculous.
“It's crazy because Murrysville was a little farm town at one time.”
Lauer created the chicken coop from leftover wood from a shed he built, he said. While Lauer's coop is subtle — brown and white painted trim tucked underneath a deck and behind several bushes and trees — some chickens are living the high life with designer coops complete with solar panels and automatic timers.
San Francisco-based kitchen and home design retailer Williams-Sonoma launched an agrarian line featuring designer chicken coops.
“We're selling them from Seattle to Boston to Florida,” vice president of merchandising Allison O'Connor told the Associated Press.
“Having farm fresh eggs is a new experience for a great many people.
People are looking at chickens more as family pets — as extensions of their family.”
While some communities have a ban on raising chickens and others aren't sure how to regulate them, Sewickley residents are permitted to keep the foul in backyards, borough Manager Kevin Flannery said.
The borough rarely receives complaints about chickens, he said.
Residents and borough leaders know about them “only when the chickens get out and run the neighborhood,” Flannery said.
While residents in Pittsburgh are permitted to have chickens, Jana Thompson said a nearly-$300 permit keeps many from considering raising them.
The laws there forced chicken coop keeps “underground,” said Thompson, president of Pittsburgh Pro-Poultry People — a grassroots group supporting urban chicken keeping.
“There's always been chickens” in backyards, Thompson said. “There are more of them as people get more worried about their food safety.”
Thompson said she estimates there could be 200 to 300 coops within city limits.
Her group's website and Facebook group gets hits from suburban residents wanting to know the rules for their jurisdiction, Thompson said.
Bobby Cherry is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Photo Gallery: Cherry Blossom Festival at North Hills Art Center
- Photo Gallery: St. Teresa of Avila School sixth-grade tableaus