Girty's Run Join Water Authority authority could get Shaler fire department land
A parcel of land next to Bauerstown Volunteer Fire Department is the focus of a new potential development for Girty's Run Joint Water Authority.
The Shaler Township Planning Commission will recommend to the township Board of Commissioners to allow the fire department to subdivide an adjacent property it owns, which will allow for the sale of a portion of the property to the water authority.
“Girty's has an agreement with the fire department to subdivide, to purchase and to build an unmanned maintenance facility,” said Emile Ketterer, an engineer with NIRA Consulting Engineers, who is working on the project. The 1.3-acre property currently is the site of the fire department's event parking lot. The subdivision will create two lots — one 0.68 acres and the other 0.62 acres — with the department retaining the smaller lot.
Girty's Run Joint Water Authority has outgrown its facility on Babcock Boulevard in Ross Township, and is looking at the new space to house some of its vehicles.
Terry Brown, a member of the township planning commission, said the subdivision is “step one” of the process for Girty's Run Joint Water Authority's new development.
Ketterer said the water authority will submit a land development plan to Shaler Township as early as next month.
Bethany Hofstetter is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-772-6364 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.