Retiring Pine-Richland School District custodian celebrated for service
After 27 years of service at the Pine-Richland School District, Richard Thoma is retiring from his position as daytime custodian at Pine-Richland Middle School.
“He's no stranger to Pine-Richland. In fact, his retirement is worthy of celebration,” communications director Rachel Hathhorn said of Thoma at the Aug. 26 school board meeting.
Thoma and his wife, Janet, attended the meeting during which his retirement was recognized and Superintendent Brian Miller presented him with a small gift.
Thoma, 55, thanked the board and administrators present after Hathhorn introduced him.
“Thanks guys, everybody. I've had a lot of memories here,” he said.
His retirement plans don't include slowing down. Thoma said he plans to “work at home and catch up on a lot of stuff.”
He'd also like to get another job closer to his home in Bruin.
Thoma began working at Pine-Richland in 1986 as a full-time custodian at the high school in the evenings. He then became a daytime custodian at Pine-Richland Middle School, which is where he worked for the remainder of his career.
Thoma said he's been at the middle school for the past 18 years. Working during the school day allowed him to connect with the students. He said the special education students, especially, were his “good friends.”
“All the kids in general were really good. I always enjoyed helping the kids out.”
His last day was Aug. 30. Thoma said employees at the middle school had a luncheon and cake to celebrate his retirement on Aug. 27.
“They're my big family, my second family,” he said.
Pine-Richland facilities management director Gary Zang said Thoma always put the district first and “will be truly missed.”
Rachel Farkas is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-779-6902 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.