Petition presented to allow beekeeping in Hampton Township
More than 500 residents want Hampton Township officials to allow backyard beekeeping.
That's how many people signed a petition that urges township officials to change Hampton's rules on urban agriculture.
Hampton beekeeper Joe Saber presented the petition with 526 signatures at the standing-room-only Aug. 28 meeting of Hampton Council.
“We the undersigned, all Hampton Township residents, urge Hampton Township Council to change Zoning Ordinance No. 627 to allow honeybees and hives in residential zones,” the petition states.
Saber described the signers as “people who realize the importance of bees,” he said.
Hampton's ordinance lists bees among “farm animals” prohibited in residential districts.
At the Aug. 28 meeting, Saber also showed Hampton Council a recent issue of Time magazine with a cover story on the status of U.S. beekeeping.
About three dozen people raised a hand when Victor Son, president of Hampton Council, asked how many people in attendance came to support Saber and urban agriculture. But none spoke at the meeting.
“The beekeeping issue has been brought our attention,” Son told the crowd. “I appreciate the petition.”
Victor told the crowd that Hampton Council plans to consider amending the township's zoning ordinance as it relates to beekeeping — after township officials update the comprehensive master plan.
“We won't be taking any action on this tonight,” Son told the audience.
Earlier this year, Hampton Council hired Environmental Planning & Design, a downtown Pittsburgh firm, to gather public input and update Hampton's comprehensive master plan by the end of 2013.
Hampton Council then will take steps to implement the new master plan's recommendations, such as suggested amendments to the township's zoning ordinance.
“Prior to changing a zoning ordinance, we would have to have public hearings,” Son said. “You could get 100 people to show up and say, ‘I don't want those (honeybees) near us.' Once the public hearing process has been completed, council can vote on the zoning changes.”
In July, Saber, the local beekeeper, relocated multiple beehives from his picturesque backyard along Leroy Drive. He moved the homes of his Italian honeybees to another municipality after Saber got a June 20 letter from Hampton officials.
The letter instructed Saber to remove his hives or risk being cited for violating the township's current zoning ordinance.
“We're looking to have them basically revise the ordinance so that chickens and bees can be kept legally in all residential areas of Hampton Township,” said master beekeeper Stephen Repasky, president of Burgh Bees, which promotes urban beekeeping.
Repasky also serves on the legislative committee of the Pennsylvania State Beekeepers Association.
At the Aug. 28 meeting of Hampton Council, Repasky offered to help township officials draft any possible, future amendment to the township's zoning ordinance that relate to urban agriculture.
“There's no difference between keeping four dogs at a house and four chickens at a house,” Repasky said. “In fact, four dogs produce more waste and noise than four chickens.”
Repasky recently helped officials in Forest Hills and Findlay Township amend their zoning ordinances to allow backyard honeybees and chickens.
Repasky said he is working with officials in Green Tree and Monroeville to also change those communities' rules on beekeeping.
Deborah Deasy is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-772-6369 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.