Fight following Hampton wedding leads to several charges
A north suburban Pittsburgh man has a court date after a post-wedding rumble at the Hampton Community Center.
Hampton police charged Jason Davies, 47, of Ingomar with aggravated assault, simple assault, disorderly conduct, resisting arrest, public drunkenness and reckless endangerment stemming from the Sept. 7 brawl.
Davies is free on $10,000 bail.
Davies' preliminary hearing was rescheduled for 1 p.m. Oct. 2 to allow time for the subpoenaing of witnesses to the fights that broke out during a party after a wedding at the community center.
Police responded to the mayhem at about 11 p.m. Sept. 7
The brawlers broke chairs and stained carpets, among other damages costing “thousands of dollars,” said Chris Lochner, manager of Hampton Township.
Lochner recently told members of Hampton Council that the township needs to install security cameras at the community center and require police presence during future nuptial events at the center.
People who rent the community center are “financially responsible for any damages for which he/she is found responsible,” according to the township's facility rental packet.
“That's why they pay a security deposit,” said Susan Bernet, assistant manager of Hampton Township.
The damage security deposit is $100 “and will be returned if not needed,” according to the facility rental packet.
Lochner and Hampton police declined to give the names of the newlyweds who exchanged vows Sept. 7 at the center.
John Michael Linkosky, Davies' lawyer, declined to comment on his client's pending court appearance.
Deborah Deasy is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-772-6369 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.