Share This Page

Shaler Area board welcomes 4 new members

| Wednesday, Dec. 11, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Bethany Hofstetter | Shaler Journal
Magisterial District Judge Elissa Lang administered the oath of office for new Shaler Area School District school board members Steve Romac, left, April Kwiatkowski, Suzanna Donahue and Tim Gapsky.

The Shaler Area School District school board reorganized for the new year with four new school board members, one of the largest turnovers in recent years.

Suzanna Donahue, Tim Gapsky, April Kwiatkowski and Steve Romac took the oath of office and joined the nine-member school board at its reorganization meeting on Dec. 4.

Donahue has been on the board since June to fill former Vice President Domenic Donovan's unexpired term after his resignation.

All four new school board members won in their respective regions in November's general election for four-year terms.

The newly sworn in board members and holdover board members took their first action to appoint Jeanne Petrovich as school board president.

“I'm truly honored to serve as your president,” Petrovich said. “I appreciate your vote of confidence.”

The board approved John Fries to serve as school board vice president.

The school board also approved the 2014 school board meeting schedule.

Committee of the Whole sessions will take place on the second Wednesday of the month at 7:30 p.m. Voting meetings will take place on the third Wednesday of the month at 7:30 p.m. Potential work sessions or voting meetings will be held on the first, fourth and fifth Wednesdays at 6 p.m., when applicable. Combined Committee of the Whole and voting meetings will be held in January, July, November and December.

A full schedule is available online at www.sasd.k12.pa.us.

Bethany Hofstetter is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-772-6364 or bhofstetter@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.