Shaler Area students learn to live by a 'code'
Shaler Area Elementary School fifth-graders Carolina Tellado, left, and Alexzia Seng practice coding during Computer Science Education Week in December. More than 1,000 students in grades four through six at Shaler Area Elementary completed an hour of coding practice in Code.org’s Hour of Code initiative.
Shaler Area Elementary School students explored computer coding during Computer Science Education Week during December.
For the first year at the school, more than 1,000 students in the fourth through sixth grades completed an hour of coding instruction and practice in Code.org's Hour of Code initiative to encourage more than 10 million students to try coding.
The game-like program provides self-directed tutorials and cartoon characters to teach students how to create repeat-loops, conditionals and basic algorithms.
Shaler Area students were able to accomplish an hour of coding in one week in their exploring computer classes.
“Coding is important in so many aspects for our students at the elementary level,” said Brian Opiela, computer teacher.
“It gives our students an opportunity to solve problems and develop abstract thinking at this age. Using logical thinking will enable them to improve and develop in their mathematical skills and on standardize tests.
“Computers skills will be the way of life for our students in 10 years from now with a void of over 1 million careers. In many countries, it is being required for students to have their skills developed in their schools. Thus, it is essential for our students to have this competitive advantage, as well.”
Shaler Area Elementary computer teachers plan to incorporate the initiative into the curriculum as an annual event starting next year.
Bethany Hofstetter is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-772-6364 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.