Highcliff students are parents of Peeps
The first-graders of Highcliff Elementary are proud to announce the adoption of about 90 fluffy, sugar-coated Peeps babies that were delivered this month.
“They were so excited to adopt these Peeps,” said first-grade teacher Kim Harbaugh, who organized the project.
The first-graders at the school in Ross Township spent the morning naming, measuring and weighing their newly adopted marshmallow pets that “hatched” from plastic eggs on April 16.
Harbaugh, of Franklin Park, said that although the activities were fun, they also helped the students practice reading, writing and math skills.
Cooper Matthews, a first-grader in Harbaugh's class, cradled his yellow Peeps chick that he named Luke Russell Skywalker, while Bruna Gomes, a first-grader in teacher Sasha Pesanka's class, explained that her orange bunny, Emily, was a little smaller than the average Peep.
Fortunately, Harbaugh said, once the students adopted and named their marshmallow friends, they lost all interest in eating them.
Landon Schmidt, 6, said he had no plans to eat his purple chick. He just wanted to “play with it and snug it.”
And, he said, “the fact that they don't respond when you ask them a question,” was the hardest part of being a Peep parent.
Students filled out the paperwork needed for new babies for their Peeps adoptees, created lists of instructions for baby sitters and wrote notes to the principal when their chicks or bunnies were reprimanded for tattling.
“Parenthood sometimes is tough,” Harbaugh told her class.
Kelsey Shea is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-772-6353 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.