After court ruling, Ross Township to offer prayers before meetings
Hours after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that prayers at local council meetings did not violate the Constitution, a Ross Township commissioner announced plans to pray before each meeting.
At the commissioners meeting May 5, Commissioner Dan DeMarco said he had prepared a prayer but would wait to read it until the township solicitor reviewed the ruling.
“I personally am really happy with the ruling,” DeMarco said. “I think we're all Christians here on the board, and that really is who that invocation is for.”
Earlier in the day, the court in Washington, D.C., issued a 5-4 decision that supported Greece, N.Y., a municipality outside of Rochester that was sued by non-Christians for offering Christian prayers before meetings. The court majority said the practice does not exclude or coerce nonbelievers.
Ross commissioners approved making a payment of up to $10,000 to Bellevue so Ross Township residents can be charged the resident rate for season passes to use the Bellevue Memorial Park Pool this summer.
Commissioners approved the plan to make the payment by a 7-0 vote. Commissioners Dave Mikec and Grant Montgomery were absent.
The payment will cover the difference in pool rates for Bellevue residents and nonresidents.
Pool passes can be purchased from 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. weekdays at the Bellevue Borough Hall, 537 Bayne Avenue in Bellevue
Resident rates for pool passes are $65 for children, $75 for adults and $50 for senior citizens. Family passes range from $100 to $150.
The pool, in Bellevue Memorial Park on Bellevue Road, will open May 24.
Kelsey Shea is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-772-6353 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.