Price to park going up for Pine-Richland students
Student drivers at Pine-Richland High School can expect to pay $10 more for the privilege of parking at the school next year.
The rate was increased from $50 to $60 per student parking pass for 2014-15, the first hike since 2007, said Assistant Superintendent Michael Pasquinelli.
The Pine-Richland School Board approved the new parking rate at its July 14 combined meeting in a 7-0 vote with directors Laura Ohlund and Dennis Sundo absent.
Pasquinelli said the extra $10 will help offset a possible decrease in funds due to the change to the activity fee structure.
New guidelines were set up in April to specify which groups and sports require the activity fee to participate, when previously all extracurriculars and sports required the fee.
“We thought a $10 fee increase was fair and appropriate after not making any changes over the last seven years,” the assistant superintendent said.
The district expects to get between $3,000 and $5,000 more this year from the increase.
The new $60 rate is comparable to surrounding school districts' student parking fees, Pasquinelli said. A year-long student parking permit is $150 at Mars Area High School, $120 at Seneca Valley and $100 at North Allegheny.
Pine-Richland High School has about 440 parking spots available to students, Pasquinelli said. Only senior and juniors are eligible to apply for a parking permit.
Rachel Farkas is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-779-6902 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.