Pine-Richland School District working with police to update emergency plan
Pine-Richland School District is looking to update its emergency operations plan and hire a new safety and security coordinator.
Superintendent Brian Miller said at a committee meeting earlier in the month that the district was beginning to update the emergency operations plan, which would be revealed later in the year.
Miller said the district has been working with Northern Tier Regional police to develop the best practices.
Emergency planning has gone from monthly fire drills to include severe weather drills and lockdown drills.
One of the features of the plan is a quick reference guide on security procedures for teachers and other staff. The guide will allow teachers, staff and substitutes to identify responsibility in any given situation.
“When it comes to emergency response, we know that it goes beyond physical security, badges and exterior doors. Also important is the behavior and habits that exist in buildings by staff, procedures in place with parents and outside groups,” Miller said.
The superintendent said parents should expect more communication about the plan as it develops.
Administrators also began looking at reassessing the role of safety and security coordinator in the district after Kurt Reuter, former safety and security coordinator for the district, resigned in June.
They hope to expand the role to have more of a district-wide responsibility, rather than just at the secondary campus, as it had been in the past.
“We took that resignation as an opportunity to revisit what we want in that position,” Miller said. “We're looking at how to address a district wide approach.”
Rachel Farkas is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-779-6902 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.