Irwin police chief put on leave
Irwin Council has placed police Chief Joe Pocsatko on paid administrative leave from the department.
Officials did not disclose the reason that the chief is on leave.
“He's not fired, but there is a legal procedure going on where he isn't allowed in the office at all, and I can't say much more than that right now,” said Mayor Dan Rose.
Council President John Cassandro and manager Mary Benko declined to comment.
Pocsatko, 34, declined to discuss the situation.
“I've got some personal issues to clear up,” Pocsatko said in a written statement.
Pocsatko went on worker's compensation in October after he broke his hand in a scuffle with a North Huntingdon man in the police station.
He planned to return in December but was placed on administrative leave before Christmas, Rose said.
Officer Dan Wensel will handle the department's administrative functions in the chief's absence.
Council named Pocsatko as chief in 2010 with an annual salary of $42,400 after former Chief John Karasek retired. He manages a roster of three full-time and 10 part-time officers.
Pocsatko's 18-year career in law enforcement includes 13 years with the Irwin police department.
Brad Pedersen is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8626, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.