ShareThis Page

North Huntingdon commissioners target roads for preliminary summer paving plan

| Wednesday, Feb. 27, 2013, 8:06 p.m.

The North Huntingdon commissioners could pave up to six miles of roads during their summer road paving program.

The township might have to pare down the preliminary list of roads to meet its $800,000 budget, which includes an additional $400,000 as part of the commissioners' reserve fund spending plan, according to manager John Shepherd.

Township officials estimated the preliminary list of roads comes with a $832,226 price tag, according to Shepherd.

The commissioners' plans include repaving portions of Nathan and Nicole drives, which were repaved last year with a microsurfacing mix, as alternate bids, which would be done if any of the budget were left over.

Public works director Rich Albert said the microsurfacing process, which involves installing a thin layer of asphalt over an existing roadway, is a cost-efficient paving method.

“There's no problem with the mix,” he said. “It's not the product, it's the aesthetics — they don't like the look of it in their neighborhood.”

The microsurfacing process requires crews to install a thin layer of asphalt on top of a roadway, in hopes of sealing it and preventing further damages.

Commissioner Tony Martino said he receives complaints about Nathan and Nicole drives on a regular basis. None of the residents were happy with how the roads turned out, he said.

“It looks like a landing strip,” Martino said.

Shepherd said microsurfacing may be good for rural roads, but officials should avoid using it in housing plans.

Shepherd said officials plan to finalize the list of streets for discussion during the March 14 workshop meeting, and take a final vote during the April 17 voting meeting.

Brad Pedersen is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8626, or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.