Group presents ideas to cut costs without affecting education quality in Norwin
A district task force is exploring several ideas that could help cut costs without affecting education programs.
The Norwin School District's Efficient and Effective District Review Task Force, which formed in September, met four times to review the district's budget, staffing and management, according to task force member Ronald Guiliana.
“Our goal as a task force was to provide as much support as possible to provide an efficient and fair way to reduce expenses, and generate more revenue to maintain quality Norwin education,” Guiliana said.
The task force recommended district administrators examine costs associated with cyber charter schools, transportation, personnel, technology, and health care, and analyze the bond market for chances to refinance its existing bond issues.
The task force recommended administrators develop plans to review assessment appeals from newly sold commercial properties, and aggressively collect delinquent earned income tax, Guiliana said.
“Real estate assessment appeals on recently sold commercial properties in the district could generate approximately $200,000, annually, based on an analysis of 2012 sales,” Guiliana said. “The district can accelerate delinquent income tax collection by increasing man hours.”
The task force also recommended the district continue working on its energy conservation program, re-evaluate its student transportation system, and analyze its health care costs in hopes of finding savings, Guiliana said.
Guiliana said the groups also recommended district officials continue working with local legislators to discuss cyber and charter school funding, and state subsidies.
“We need to lobby state legislatures for a fair, adequate and equitable funding system for public education, so the district can meet the normal increased cost of operations on an annual basis,” Guiliana said.
School board president Robert Perkins said officials plan to take all of the task force's recommendations into consideration as it continues to develop the 2013-14 budget.
Last month, the board vowed not to exceed a 1.5 mill real estate tax increase to balance the $61.6 budget for next year, which includes a $1.9 million deficit.
“We hope to reduce the burden on the taxpayers, while keeping the high educational standards at Norwin,” Guiliana said.
Brad Pedersen is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8626, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.