Irwin road plan might need to be adjusted
Irwin Council hopes to get its street resurfacing program on the road this summer.
But the board might need to cut its preliminary list of 14 streets, with an estimated cost of $387,800, nearly in half to meet its $200,000 budget.
Manager Mary Benko said it's not uncommon for preliminary street program budgets to exceed the borough's budget.
“We usually have about $400,000 in need, with only about $200,000 available,” she said. “We're going to be working on creating a prioritized list.”
Council President John Cassandro suggested looking into tar and chipping roads in an attempt to save money and get more road repairs done.
He said it could be the most cost-effective way to address the streets.
Last year, officials discussed using tar and chips to repair roadways throughout the borough, but balked after hearing complaints from residents, Bove said.
Tar and chips might be effective on Pennsylvania Avenue, which has a lot of cracking, Bove said, but he suggested sealing individual cracks on Pennsylvania Avenue, instead of using tar and chips.
“If we tar and chip, some residents may bring some of the stones to council chambers and throw them at us,” Bove said.
“We will get complaints about the gravel, and we'd have to repaint all of the lines whenever you tar and chip.”
Bove said Highland Avenue, a residential street which is about 1,500 feet long, needs to be completely resurfaced, making it the borough's most expensive roadway at $70,800.
Although it doesn't see much traffic, Bove said, its surface needs to be taken down by about three inches to install a new two-inch layer of binder, and about 1.5 inches of asphalt.
In addition, Bove estimated Highland Avenue would need an additional $165,250 to install 10 catch basins, a storm-water manhole and new pipelines.
Bove said that Conley Drive, which is used primarily as a shortcut between Route 30 and Caruthers Lane, would cost approximately $51,500 to repair.
“It's primarily used by drivers who want to come from Caruthers and make a left turn onto Route 30,” Bove said.
“You're not allowed to make a left off of Caruthers Lane, so they go down Conley Drive, which brings most of its traffic.”
Bove said Conley Drive also would need additional drainage work.
He estimated it would cost $66,600 to install eight catch basins and piping.
“These drainage projects need done first,” Bove said.
“We don't want to resurface the roads first, because poor drainage has been adding to these roads problems.”
Benko said the drainage work would be covered by the borough's sewer and storm-water fund, not the street paving budget.
Council expected to vote on a finalized list of roads during its meeting last night.
Brad Pedersen is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8626, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.