North Huntingdon township panels to split cost of road repair
The North Huntingdon Township Municipal Authority and township commissioners plan to share the cost of repairing six roads in the Country Hills neighborhood.
The two entities agreed last week to share the costs of repairing roads affected by the Country Hills sewer line replacement project, according to Mike Turley, assistant township manager.
NHTMA officials estimated it would cost the municipal authority $181,000 to repair Laurel Avenue, Deerfield Drive, Greenfield Court, Country Hills Drive, Sweetbriar Drive and Fairwood Drive, Turley said.
“They're going to move ahead with their project this year, and dig trenches to replace the lines,” Turley said. “After the roads and trenches settle for a year, we'll come in and repave the roads during the summers of 2014 and 2015, so it will be a better product in the end.”
Officials estimated it would cost $282,000 to repave the streets from curb to curb, leaving the township to cover the remaining $101,000, Turley said.
In other news
North Huntingdon officials plan to pay off its new street sweeper in an effort to continue spending down its $5.8 million reserve fund.
The township purchased the sweeper in February for about $217,000, according to public works superintendent Rich Albert.
The commissioners plan to spend about $2.2 million of its reserve fund, Shepherd said. In addition to the street sweeper, their spending plan includes dedicating an additional $400,000 to the 2013 road program, and paying off the $1.8 million mortgage on the public works building.
Brad Pedersen is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8626, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.