ShareThis Page

Uncut North Huntingdon lawns could cost

| Wednesday, May 1, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

An uncut lawn could become a big expense.

During the spring and summer, municipal officials in the area plan to cite property owners who let their lawns become overgrown and unkempt. Overgrown grass creates an eyesore, sometimes attracts rodents and snakes, and could cause neighbors to become apathetic, said Andrew Blenko, North Huntingdon's planner and engineer.

“Uncut properties tend to lead to a gradual decline of other properties in a neighborhood,” Blenko said.

North Huntingdon officials wait until grass grows to a foot before taking any action.

Once the township's code-enforcement officer cites property owners, officials give them three weeks to cut their grass — or else.

“In most cases, a property owner will get busy and cut their lawn when they're notified,” Blenko said.

An overgrown lawn could become a high expense when township crews need to step in, Blenko said.

According to township ordinances, officials charge $25 per hour for labor and $75 per hour if a tractor is needed. The cost of mowing becomes a lien against the property, along with $91.50 in solicitor's and filing fees, Blenko added.

“In addition to the man hours consumed in cutting the grass, there is significant clerical and legal time involved,” Blenko said.

The average cost comes to about $282, Blenko said.

Last year, township officials cited 42 properties for overgrown lawns.

North Irwin officials do not take action against a property owner until the grass on a lawn is about eight inches, manager Adele Nehas said.

Each year, borough officials handle about a half a dozen complaints about overgrown lawns, Nehas said.

“We give residents three to seven days after we send a notice, and most of it gets done,” Nehas said. “I've been here for five years and only remember one time the borough took someone to court (for not complying).”

Nehas said the borough levies fines of at least $300 to anyone who doesn't cut the grass after receiving correspondence.

Irwin officials require residents to not let their grass grow more than 7 inches, according to public-works director Jim Halfhill.

When the grass becomes overgrown, Halfhill, said he attempts to meet with the property owner before sending a letter asking that the grass be cut.

If there is no response, borough officials hire a private landscaping crew to cut the yard, which comes with a bill of $75 to $150, he said.

“We deal with a couple dozen of these cases per year, and we're not in the business of cutting grass and maintaining yards,” Halfhill said. “Our biggest problems with overgrown lawns come from people who no longer live in their properties or have been foreclosed upon.”

Halfhill said neatly trimmed lawns are important for not only the property itself but for the entire neighborhood.

“That kind of blight and neglect can bring property values down,” Halfhill said. “It really takes away the entire curb appeal from the entire area.”

Brad Pedersen is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8626.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.