Irwin streets slated for summer road paving and resurfacing program
Irwin Council planned to award its summer road paving and resurfacing projects yesterday, Wednesday, during its monthly voting meeting.
Officials plan to award the project to Oakmont-based A. Folino Construction, which was the lowest of four bidders, at $194,685.
The program will address six roadways — Pennsylvania Avenue, Fifth Street, Walnut Street, 10th Street Extension, Western Alley and drainage on Oak Street.
The road program targets seven roadways, and engineer Lucien Bove estimated it would cost approximately $177,200.
Although the low bid came in higher than Bove's estimate, he said he is confident he will be able to stay within the borough's budget.
“We should be able to stay under our budget this year,” Bove said. “I don't anticipate anything to make us exceed the budget, but if we have to, we can always do less patching and sealing with contractors and have it done in house.”
Officials pared the list down from 14 roadways to meet its $200,000 resurfacing budget, Bove said.
Although it wasn't included in the original project, officials added Iroquois Street to the paving project.
Officials expect to repave the entire street, Bove said.
“We're going to put a 2-inch binder on that roadway and an inch-and-a-half top layer on it,” Bove said. “That means we're going to mill it down pretty deep.”
Bove said he was unsure when the project will begin.
Brad Pedersen is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8626, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.