Greensburg man accused of sending teen nude photos for distribution
A Greensburg man is charged with texting nude photographs of his ex-girlfriend, the mother of a Norwin High School student, to a student at the school who continued to spread the photos, police say.
Joe Miller, 25, of Milbee Lane, is charged with dissemination to minors and corruption of minors. He was released from jail on $10,000 unsecured bail.
James Welsh III, listed as Miller's attorney in court documents, declined comment.
A staff member at the high school contacted the North Huntingdon Police Department in May when he learned a student received nude images of another student's mother, according to court records. That student told police a relationship had ended between his mother and Miller, and that several nude pictures of her were circulating among his friends.
Police said they talked to the 17-year-old student who received the photos. The teen told police he received text messages from Miller, along with several nude photographs of the woman.
The text messages stated that Miller hated his girlfriend's son and he wanted his life ruined, according to court documents. The teen told police that Miller threatened him and told him to send the pictures to his friends.
The teen told police he sent the photographs because he was scared. He said Miller used to be his baseball coach, according to court documents.
Miller arrived at the police station on May 9, but told police he would not answer any questions. His phone, which was seized as evidence, contained four nude photographs of the woman, according to court documents.
A preliminary hearing is set for Oct. 2 with North Huntingdon District Judge Doug Weimer.
Amanda Dolasinski is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8626.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.