ShareThis Page

Greensburg man accused of sending nude photos Norwin student to stand trial

| Wednesday, Oct. 2, 2013, 5:52 p.m.

A teenage boy told police he was frightened when he received five or six nude images of a classmate's mother on his cell phone, according to his testimony last week.

The Norwin High School student allegedly received a text message with the images from Joe Miller, 25, his former baseball coach, in May.

“It said, he ‘hated' (the woman's son) and the rest was a bunch of pictures,” the 17-year-old boy said. “It said, ‘ruin his life or others will be punished.' I felt scared.”

The Tribune-Review is not naming the witness because he is a juvenile. The paper also does not identify alleged victims of a sex-related crime.

North Huntingdon District Judge Douglas Weimer ordered Miller, 25, of Milbee Lane in Greensburg, to stand trial for dissemination of obscene material to minors and corruption of minors. He is accused of sending nude images of his ex-girlfriend to her son's classmate, who sent the images to others at Norwin High School.

James Welsh III, Miller's attorney, argued that Miller never instructed the teen to disperse the images, nor did he specifically suggest who should receive them. Miller did not speak during the hearing.

The teen testified that he was golfing at Irwin Country Club when he received the text message in May. He said he felt “threatened” and sent the message to eight or nine classmates, according to testimony.

North Huntingdon Township Police Detective Sgt. Jeffrey Bouldin testified that Miller voluntarily went to the police station about a week after the incident, but informed investigators that he did not wish to make a statement. Bouldin said he seized Miller's phone and obtained a search warrant for the content.

A formal court arraignment for Miller has not yet been set.

Amanda Dolasinski is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8626.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.