Hannastown woman faces charges of drug possession
A Hannastown woman is facing drug-related charges after police accused her of discarding four packets of heroin marked “Dream Team” after a traffic stop in North Huntingdon 30 in June.
Kayla Ronea Tolvinski, 23, of Shoupe Avenue, is charged with possession of a controlled substance, possession of drug paraphernalia and tampering with evidence.
A phone number is not listed for Tolvinski. Court records do not indicate if she has an attorney.
North Huntingdon police initiated a traffic stop on the Ford Escape station wagon in which she was riding after the driver made an illegal right turn on Route 30 eastbound.
While police were talking to the driver, they noticed Tolvinski, who was sitting in the back of the vehicle, playing with several purses next to her in what appeared to be an attempt to hide something. Police requested the department's drug-sniffing dog when they spotted two silver spoons on the rear of the floor, according to the complaint.
Police searched the vehicle and seized three silver spoons, three hypodermic needles, a razor blade and a cap to the hypodermic needle, according to the complaint.
Tolvinski agreed to go to the station, police said.
The officer returned to his squad car and found four cellophane packets stamped “Dream Team” lying on the ground next to the door where Tolvinski had exited, and lab tests confirmed the packets contained 0.05 grams of heroin, according to the complaint.
A preliminary hearing is set for Nov. 27 with North Huntingdon District Judge Douglas Weimer.
Amanda Dolasinski is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8626 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.