Candidates square off for North Huntingdon commissioners' seat
Over the past year, North Huntingdon commissioners cut taxes and advocated for development, projects two candidates said they hope to continue to do in the next term.
Republican incumbent Zachary Haigis and Democrat Anthony Gockel are vying for the 2nd Ward commissioner seat in North Huntingdon. The election is Nov. 5.
Haigis, who was elected to his first term in 2009, is running for a second, four-year term.
Among his accomplishments as a commissioner, Haigis said he is proud of his efforts to cut taxes for township residents.
“Last year, we lowered the taxes by 1 mill,” he said.
“I promised better government and more fiscal responsibility. I'm proud to say we lowered the debt.”
Haigis said he was an advocate for redevelopment of Norwin Towne Square.
The shopping center recently received a five-year tax break so that businesses would move in to rejuvenate the 1950s-era plaza on the west end of the township.
Continuing with those efforts, Haigis said he would like to attract more businesses, and possibly manufacturing companies, into the area.
The county and municipality's tax rates are selling points, he said.
Bringing more jobs into the area is also a top priority for challenger Anthony Gockel.
“Basically I just want to help North Huntingdon improve,” he said.
“I hope that bringing jobs into the area (will continue improvements); things that people can make a career out of.”
Gockel said he would draw from his professional experiences to lead the township.
“I'm a listener,” he said.
“That's something that I have to do at my job. I've learned to listen to people and talk to them with understanding and in return give them your opinion.”
Amanda Dolasinski is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8626.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.