North Irwin write-in candidates to fill seats
Despite initial concerns there would be empty seats on North Irwin borough council, a full council should be appointed by January, officials said.
John McIntyre was re-elected, according to unofficial election results. The top three write-in vote getters will round out the other four open seats, John Montini, director of the Westmoreland County Election Bureau said.
“There's always going to be seven,” he said.
Names of the write-in vote winners will not be announced until the votes are certified. Montini said it can take several weeks for the bureau to certify those votes.
There is no concern there will be any empty seats, which would halt borough business, said borough manager Adele Nehas.
Although she said she has an idea who won write-in votes, she declined to name anyone until the votes are certified.
Ken Galley, Kim Macalus, Matt Berkhouse, and Ron Rodgers did not seek re-election. Berkhouse had been appointed to finish the term of Zach Laugherty, who resigned in 2012. Tom Harrison resigned in January, but his term would have been completed in December.
Ronald Brown is council's only incumbent council member. Gina Sonnik was appointed to finish out the term of Bernie Reynolds, who died in May.
In the case of a vacancy, council members have 30 days to fill them, according to the state borough code. If that doesn't work, council must form a vacancy board that has 15 days to fill open positions.
If still open, the vacancy board must petition the Court of Common Pleas to appoint a resident who is registered to vote in the community.
Amanda Dolasinski is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8626 or adolasinski@tribweb.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.