North Irwin budget to include police cost increase
Although officials are still haggling over a price, police protection in North Irwin borough will likely fall to Irwin police.
Council members met for a special meeting Monday night to approve the budget for North Irwin, including its contract for police service. Officials had set out to shop for police protection over the summer, but settled on Irwin when no other offers surfaced.
Council members approved the budget with a restriction on the monthly police expense not to exceed $1,650 per month.
North Irwin Council hopes to negotiate a lower price.
Irwin police have asked for $1,650 per month to cover North Irwin, which is $150 more than last year when they charged $1,500 per month.
North Irwin Council members hope to negotiate an increase of $75 instead.
“I'm saying, we go back at them with a $75 increase and see what they say,” Mike Schade, council member said. “They might accept $75.”
A $75 increase would equal $1,575 per month, or $18,900 per year.
The contract term changed from two years to one year.
The department is supposed to drive through the borough for 30 minutes per shift and to answer calls when necessary.
“I'm happy. I always see them driving through here,” Schade said. “I just think they should be here at our council meetings.”
Each month, Irwin police send a call report to the borough office. Schade said he would appreciate if an officer attended the monthly council meetings to explain the calls.
Council members discussed shopping around for police protection in August when they voted to send letters to neighboring municipalities inquiring about service.
Letters were sent to police departments in Irwin, North Huntingdon, Manor, Penn Township, Trafford and Southwest Regional Police Department.
Irwin and Southwest Regional were the only departments that responded. Schade said the borough never pursued an agreement with Southwest Regional Police Department.
Amanda Dolasinski is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8626 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Judge will not recuse himself from Scaife case
- Steelers notebook: Thomas, Moats only starting defensive players to see action vs. Panthers
- Steelers laud decision, praise Brady for taking on Goodell
- Liriano struggles as Brewers complete sweep of Pirates
- Vick supporters, opponents demonstrate before Steelers’ game, but coexist
- Experts warn Kane’s Haiti trip might jeopardize any case from 2014 wiretap
- Residents want crossing guard at spot where McKeesport student was struck, killed
- With most starters resting, Steelers turn in lackluster loss at Heinz
- Pittsburgh schools chief Lane stepping down next summer
- Two Westmoreland men charged with drug possession
- Pittsburgh Mayor Peduto: Public has stake in Penguins