North Irwin considers changing some alleys to streets to increase funding
In an effort to rake in more funding from the state, officials in North Irwin are considering changing some alleys into streets for eligibility in the liquid-fuels funding program.
The Municipal Liquid Fuels Program, run by the state Department of Transportation, last year allocated about $11 million to counties across the state, which distribute funding to municipalities. North Irwin borough received $17,935.
There potentially are 10 alleys that could be converted into streets, Councilman Michael Schade said.
Funding from the state program supports a range of projects, such as construction and maintenance of public roads or streets. If the borough designates more of its alleys as streets, officials think they could secure additional funding from the program.
Allocations are based on the population of the municipality, as well as miles of roads on their approved liquid-fuel inventory.
To be placed on the system, a road must have a minimum of 33 feet of right of way in a township or 16 feet in a borough, according to PennDOT criteria.
The drivable surface must be at least 16 feet wide and 250 feet long. If the road has a dead end, it must have a cul-de-sac at the end with a minimum 40-foot radius, according to criteria.
To continue receiving funding through the program, a road must be maintained so it can be driven at 15 mph.
As part of the changes, Kim Macalus, council president, suggested holding a contest to allow borough children name the streets.
Amanda Dolasinski is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8626, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.