Irwin police to cover North Irwin
Despite objections, police protection in North Irwin will revert to Irwin police next year.
North Irwin Borough on Monday approved an agreement to receive police protection from its neighboring borough for an increased cost over last year's rate. Outgoing council president Kim Macalus and Councilmember Gina Sonnik cast the dissenting votes.
“I haven't been satisified with the coverage,” said Kim Macalus, outgoing council president. “We haven't met the chief yet and it's very disappointing.”
Irwin Council hired Roger E. Pivirotto, a former state police lieutenant, as the new police chief in October.
Officials for both boroughs had been haggling over a price for police protection through early December. North Irwin council had set out to shop for protection over the summer, but settled on Irwin when no other feasible offers surfaced.
“I don't think we exhausted all of our options,” Sonnik said.
As part of the agreement, the contract will last for one year and cost $1,650 per month.
The rate is $150 more than the current rate of $1,500 per month. North Irwin council members had hoped to negotiate an increase of $75 instead.
The department is supposed to drive through the borough for 30 minutes per shift and to answer calls when necessary.
“I think it's a fine contract as long as they hold up their end of the deal,” Councilmember Michael Schade said.
Council members discussed shopping around for police protection in August when they voted to send letters to neighboring municipalities inquiring about service.
Letters were sent to police departments in Irwin, North Huntingdon, Manor, Penn Township, Trafford and Southwest Regional Police Department.
Irwin and Southwest Regional were the only departments that responded. Schade said the borough never pursued an agreement with Southwest Regional Police Department.
Amanda Dolasinski is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.