Vacant seat on North Irwin council
A two-year council seat is up for grabs in North Irwin.
After write-in votes were certified last month, North Irwin officials determined there is a vacant seat for a two-year term. Council is accepting letters of interest from residents to fill the position.
Edwin “Bo” Anthony, who has previously served on council, was elected by write-in votes to both a four-year term and a two-year term. Borough manager Adele Nehas confirmed that he chose the four-year term.
Anthony did not return a call seeking comment.
“Whoever wants the seat would have to submit a letter,” Mayor James Douglas said. “During the January meeting, we'll open the letters and have council vote on it.”
Also elected by write-in votes were Michael Schade and Jeff Scott.
The county election board signed a precertification of the write-in votes, and then there was a five-day waiting period for residents to challenge the votes. With no objections, the write-in votes were certified by the board on Nov. 27.
In the case of a vacancy, council members have 30 days to fill it, according to the state borough code. If that doesn't work, council must form a vacancy board that has 15 days to fill the spot.
If the seat remains open, the vacancy board must petition the Court of Common Pleas to appoint a resident who is registered to vote in the community.
Incumbent council member John McIntyre was re-elected, according to November election results.
Ken Galley, Kim Macalus, Matt Berkhouse, and Ron Rodgers did not seek re-election. Berkhouse had been appointed to finish the term of Zach Laugherty, who resigned in 2012. Tom Harrison resigned in January, but his term would have been completed in this month. Ronald Brown remains on council after being elected in 2012. Gina Sonnik was appointed to finish the term of Bernie Reynolds, who died in May.
Amanda Dolasinski is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.