Wet road, bald tires likely played role in fatal North Huntingdon wreck
Slick road conditions coupled with speed and a pair of bald tires likely were factors in a fatal accident along Route 30 on Friday, according to authorities.
“We're still awaiting the results from our accident reconstructionist, but the preliminary investigation indicates that all the water on the roadway during the rainstorm along with speed and the fact that the rear tires of the vehicle driven by the young man who died likely contributed in the accident,” North Huntingdon police Chief Andrew Lisiecki said on Monday.
Witnesses told investigators that Matthew A. Kellerman, 18, of Peach Way in North Huntingdon, was traveling westbound when the Jeep sport utility vehicle he was driving appeared to hydroplane, according to Lisiecki.
The accident occurred at around 2:40 p.m. between Glendale Drive and Idaho Lane across from Penn Lincoln Memorial Park, according to a 911 dispatcher.
“Witnesses said the Jeep appeared to spin counterclockwise, which indicates that the driver may have over-compensated after it started to hydroplane,” Lisiecki said. “The vehicle then traveled across the eastbound lanes and struck two vehicles.”
Kellerman's SUV went airborne and landed on a guide rail, according to the chief.
One of the two vehicles that was hit was a van occupied by a female driver and four children. The other vehicle was an SUV driven by a man, Lisiecki said.
All six victims were taken to area hospitals with non-life threatening injuries, the chief said.
Kellerman was pronounced dead at the scene, according to the Westmoreland County Coroner's office.
Tony LaRussa is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at 412-856-7400, ext. 8626, or at email@example.com. The Greensburg Tribune-Review contributed to this report.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.